Under the existing system of the country, land is the foundation for farmers to settle down, bearing the social security and employment security of farmers. How can farmers easily transfer their land. Moreover, the land transfer price is too low, so many farmers would rather abandon the land than transfer it. The low transfer price is the exploitation of vulnerable farmers, so it is not surprising that the transfer is cold. The cold circulation makes it difficult to concentrate the scattered cultivated land, and the UAV is useless on the scattered land.

As the representative of smart agricultural machinery, plant protection UAV has been in the limelight for a while, but it has been very popular all the time. The reason is that land circulation is cold, technical farmers are insufficient, and UAVs are expensive.

The UAV for plant protection has high requirements for operators. In the aging and hollow countryside, the young and middle-aged labor force is insufficient, and the physical strength and energy of the older generation can not keep up with them, so they are not suitable operators. There is not enough technical support from farmers, they do not know how to farm scientifically, and the land is scattered. These factors restrict the development of agricultural mechanization, let alone the need for a higher level of plant protection UAV.

The large grain growers with centralized land circulation will not easily get started. After all, the price of a plant protection UAV is equivalent to a car. Although they have a larger scale, they also bear a greater risk. Because of more land, greater output and a slight decline in food prices, they may lose their money. This is not an extreme meteorological disaster that cannot be intervened.

For these large grain growers with hundreds of acres or thousands of acres, although it is necessary to purchase large-scale agricultural machinery, the price of hundreds of thousands is also a big burden. We will not pursue drones until we see obvious benefits again.

Ordinary farmers have low income and large expenditure, and their consumption concept is conservative. Focusing only on the farmers' pockets and thinking of making the last dollar of farmers, this is not the way to go for plant protection drones. It is only right to drive farmers to become rich together, so that farmers can taste the benefits and farmers can not live without drones. UAVs should not appear around farmers as a tall stunt, but should be used as ordinary agricultural machinery to enter farmers' work and improve their lives.

The mode of Jifei UAV is to set up its own plant protection station to provide plant protection services for surrounding farmland. That is to say, Jifei does not sell planes, but only takes the responsibility of taking the land, carrying out spraying services and following the path of a service provider. Alibaba is also carrying out this business. It can make payments through Alipay and customize services.

This is a feasible way to support many enterprises. Agricultural production has the characteristics of timeliness and regionality. Enterprises providing services must complete operations in specific regions within a specific time. Enterprises that cross regions for a long time will face many difficulties, which can delimit the survival scope of enterprises.

Now the concept of light assets is very popular. Why can't farmers light assets? This is nothing new in the United States. Farmers only need to provide their own land and planting plans. For the rest, from seed supply to farming, production and marketing, there are companies providing services, including financial companies providing loans.

Let farmers earn money, they will earn money. Otherwise, farmers have no money, and where do you go to make money as a farmer? I'm afraid the only way is to ask the government for subsidies. If we can't even achieve win-win results, how can we talk about wisdom in smart agriculture?

Source: Agricultural World Network